Anthropic says it has begun giving a team from METR, the nonprofit frontier-model evaluator, what it calls employee-like access to the company. Six METR staff have been onboarded with company hardware, office space, and access to internal tools and systems that Anthropic describes as roughly on par with what its own risk assessment teams use. The key change versus earlier third-party arrangements is publication control: METR will publish its own analysis of Anthropic's risk levels, incidents, and practices, and Anthropic cannot veto publication.
The limits are spelled out. Outside a small set of predefined categories, namely customer data, attorney-client privileged material, and details of model architectures, Anthropic employees are told to share information with the METR team as they would with a colleague working on alignment risk. Anthropic can require redactions only when material falls into those narrow categories, and METR is free to describe the redactions publicly and say whether it thinks they were justified. Anthropic and METR have already worked together over the past year on reviews of the company's Risk Reports.
The post sets out a three-tier structure for outside evaluators. In the first tier, evaluators run narrowly scoped risk investigations and can publish findings with Anthropic's approval. In the second, they get more information and can publish without approval. The third tier is the METR arrangement, which pairs employee-like embedded access with second-tier publication rights. Anthropic frames the model by analogy to bank supervision, where regulators station resident examiners inside the largest banks on the grounds that institutions know more about their own risks than outsiders can see from the outside.
Other evaluators are in lower-access arrangements. SecureBio is reviewing the chemical and biological weapons chapter of Anthropic's August Risk Report, after publishing a pilot review of the previous report. Anthropic says it is working with Accenture and Faculty toward a partnership covering model evaluation and red-teaming, alignment assessments, and safeguard testing, and that it is in early talks with several other organizations, including Hugging Face.
The announcement follows last month's commitment to stronger third-party assessment and Anthropic's signing of the White House Accord on Super Intelligence, under which companies pledged to work with independent external auditors or evaluators. Anthropic says the embedding is voluntary and argues that every frontier AI company should do the same.
The caveats are mostly structural. The arrangement is self-designed and voluntary, so the access tiers, redaction categories, and evaluator selection all remain Anthropic's choices rather than regulatory requirements. Excluding model-architecture information also limits what outside reviewers can say about some technical risk factors. How independent the process proves in practice will depend on what METR actually publishes, how often redactions are invoked, and whether other labs adopt comparable terms.
- Anthropic News: details three access tiers, redaction carve-outs and a bank-supervision analogy, urging other frontier labs to copy the model.
- TechCrunch: leads with Anthropic surrendering the right to block METR's assessments of its risks, incidents and practices.
- The Information: brief framing it as evaluators now physically working inside the company, linking it to prior CEO commitments.